Wesley Snipes IRS Tax Fraud

Posted in Actors, Movies by The Gossip Monger on October 19th, 2006.

According to The Smoking Gun, actor Wesley snipes has been indicted for tax fraud! Failing to file 6 years of tax returns, and demanding $12,000,000 USD in refunds, Snipes and two others were indicted for knowingly attempting to defraud the US Government.

TSG spells out how the scam worked in great detail:

According to the indictment, Snipes conspired with Eddie Ray Kahn and former certified public accountant Douglas Rosile in the tax scam. Kahn is the founder of a Florida company (now known as Guiding Light of God Ministries) that, investigators allege, “promoted and sold fraudulent tax schemes” to clients like Snipes. Kahn has claimed that U.S. citizens could only be taxed on income earned from certain foreign-based activities (and not on money made in this country). This claim–known as the “861 argument” for the section of the tax code to which it refers–has been flatly rejected by the Internal Revenue Service.

The moral of the story: if you’re rich, pay your taxes.

This entry was posted on Thursday, October 19th, 2006 at 8:09 pm and is tagged with eddie ray kahn, certified public accountant, wesley snipes, internal revenue service, irs tax, tax fraud, god ministries, douglas rosile, tax scam, florida company, tax schemes, guiding light, moral of the story, smoking gun, indictment, tsg, 6 years, tax returns, us government, investigators. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback.

Viewing 17 Comments

Jason 2 years ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

Maybe he's been considering the legality of the current implementation of the US Income Tax -- http://www.originalintent.org/edu/fedincometax.php

reply edit reblog flag

Richard Palmquist 2 years ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

Who is more to blame? Snipes/Kahn or the IRS? Can you believe an agency with the sophistication of the IRS would VALIDATE the Bills of Exchange produced by Kahn, causing the refunds to be issued? Then, can you believe the IRS would go FIVE YEARS before focusing upon Snipes? Who is more to blame? Kahn and Snipes for not thinking clearly about the law? Or the IRS for being incometent to enforce the law?

reply edit reblog flag

http://www.truthradio.com

Gary Gnu 2 years ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

Conspiracy? Crime? Smoking guns? Unlawful activities?

http://www.freedomtofascism.com/

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4312730...

reply edit reblog flag

dennis18328 1 year ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

Wastley Snipes is 100% percent CORRECT people . Read you IRS code book . The IRS is the enemy of the american people .They are playing games and lying plain and simple .

reply edit reblog flag

Knat 1 year ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

It's much more complicated than that, however though Snipes is substantially correct, the IRS is relying on certain loop holes or alleged acts of "volunteering to be subject to there jurisdiction" in declaring him and all his income from whatEVER source, taxable.

It's a sham-scam perpetrated for over 6 decades against the American People, initially under the guise of acquiring the cooperation of the American people in support of the war effort; and before that, the scam to tie everyone into the jusisdiction of the system was(is) masquerading as the Social Security System offered as a panacea to a people ravaged by a manipulated economy.

Check Title 26 and read your history.

Whether it was for greed, rightous indignation at being cheated by his own government or a desire to be the champion of the American people, thankyou Westley.

reply edit reblog flag

John 1 year ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

If you search the tax code with a computer for the required codes and instructions, section 861 is the result:
http://whatistaxed.com

reply edit reblog flag

http://whatistaxed.com

Michael Walker 1 year ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

I have studied the IRCode, the Civil Procedures Guide, the Handbook for Special Agents and the Federal Register for more than 20 years.
I have used numerous search engines to attempt to prove and disprove both sides of the "story", as it were, and I have come to a simple conclusion.
"We The People" are being lied to, falsely accused, falsely imprisoned, slandered, maligned, used, abused, and forced into situations where some have chosen to take their own lives by a greedy, corrupt, and out of control government that has grown fat on the ignorance of its "people".
Only, and I mean ONLY, when "We The People" stand up, en masse, and demand, yes "DEMAND", that the TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, be revealed, in specificity, regarding the fraudulent declaration that the 16th Amendment was ratified, ONLY when those who have knowingly and willfully abused their "alleged" authority and power have been made to account for their actions, and ONLY when restitution has been made to the American People and the so called "16th" Amendment has been repealed, ONLY THEN will this great country, once again, be a Nation of "We The People".
John F. Kennedy once said "Ask not what your country can do for you, but ask what you can do for your country".
Terrific sloganism of the time. Loosely translated it means "Ask not what those in power can do for you, but what you can do for those in power".
Intimidation through custom and tradition and the loss of freedoms by degree over long periods of time have reduced this country to what it has fought from its inception, a fascist state.
Recall when the "seat belt law" was passed. They "Those in power", in specificity, stated that they would never use that "Law" to pull any person over just for not wearing a seat belt.
In less than 3 years that's exactly what was being done, giving police broadened "powers" to go on "fishing" expeditions.
I used to be a police officer, so I am familiar with the mentality and knew that, even though it (the seat belt law) would pass under certain auspices, that those same considerations would be thrown out like the baby with the bathwater.
The "IRS" is no different, they are our "Gestapo", and if you have any doubts about that then your ignorance is our governmental bliss.
I received a letter from the Treasury Department stating that for the years 2000, and 2001 I "owed" nearly 27 billion dollars in back taxes, penalties, and interest.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
Apparently I've been a baaaad boy.
That or they have an idiot working for them.
You tell me...

reply edit reblog flag

Joe Mastriano, CPA 1 year ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

I still say he would not be in trouble if I represented him. Good tax representation is essential if you don't want to be a victim.

reply edit reblog flag

http://www.taxproblem.org

Joe Mastriano, CPA 1 year ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

My web address was left out.www.taxproblem.org

reply edit reblog flag

http://www.taxproblem.org

Michael Walker 1 year ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

You might want to check out certain information (if you haven't already) at www.truthattack.org, the We The People foundation, and the Lie Free Zone.
The first reference will give you the entire transcript of the Cryer trial in Louisiana where he took on the IRS and won, something you can use as a paradigm in your own case.
Also Truth Radio, re replays a Paul Harvey comment over and over again on how the McKees got their money back from the IRS in a 9th circuit appeal because they argued that the IRS Code was too difficult for the average person (even most IRS agents) to understand, so it was made "Void for vagueness".
And don't forget the Kuglin references, she beat them on the fact that she asked for and never received information on where, exactly, within the confines of the Code was her "Tax liability and filing requirement" created> They never told her, they took her to court, she showed the jury her "Good faith" requests and walked away free from the IRS and their heavy handed tactics.
Good luck Wes.
Now you get to take on some REAL bloodsuckers...

reply edit reblog flag

jabia 1 year ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

this lady is a ex I R S agent and she says its a fruad and she and her assoc/friends have helped many people.....

sheryl Jackson go to http// www.invisibleshacles.com

reply edit reblog flag

jabia 1 year ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

http://www.etherzone.com/2003/shie061703.shtml

reply edit reblog flag

jabia 1 year ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

http://www.invisibleshackles.com/ sheryl jackson

reply edit reblog flag

jabia 1 year ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

DOES ANYONE KNOW ABOUT FILING ONE OF THESE ON AN I.R.S. AGENT ? COMMERCIAL LIENS: A MOST POTENT WEAPON

reply edit reblog flag

kristen 10 months ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

I've just recently learned about this notion that there really isn't a "law" requiring people to pay income tax. But if that is so, then what can be done to stop people like Wesley from going to jail anyway? It's very scary to know that the gov't and IRS are using mafia-like intimidation techniques to scare people into paying income tax. But what is the other alternative? Fighting off the big boys for the rest of your life? This is all very confusing, and alarming. Wesley was right for doing so, but I'll be curious to see what happens to him.

reply edit reblog flag

Mike 10 months ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

All of you people are nuts. Try looking at this wev site put together by someone without a dog in the fight. Next argument of yours will be "the sky isn't blue"

reply edit reblog flag

http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html

Mike 10 months ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html

reply edit reblog flag

http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html