The Gossip Rag: Celebrity life, photos, gossip, and news


Britney Spears’ Birth: It’s a Boy!

Posted in Britney Spears, Babies by The Gossip Monger on September 13th, 2006.

Britney Spears has discharged her latest baby boy on the world. Since Kevin Federline was getting sick of her looking like this, it’s probably good for their marriage that this happened:

britney-spears-pregnant.jpg

The un-named baby boy weighed just 6 pounds and 11 ounces. It’s good the baby was delivered at 2 AM on September 12th, because giving birth on 9/11 would probably have been a bad omen. Sources: [1], [2], [3], [4].

Suri Cruise “Cracked” Photo

Posted in Babies, TomKat by The Gossip Monger on September 7th, 2006.

Cracked did a great photoshop of Tom Cruise / Katie Holmes baby Suri:

suri-cruise-photoshop.jpg

Suri Cruise Pictures

Posted in Babies, TomKat by The Gossip Monger on September 6th, 2006.

suri-cruise.jpg

Yup, that’s Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes’ little baby Suri Cruise on the cover of Vanity Fair with her parents!

Suri Cruise Birth Certificate!

Posted in Babies, TomKat by The Gossip Monger on July 10th, 2006.

TMZ somehow got a copy of Tom Cruise and Katie Holme’s first born daughter Suri Cruise’s birth certificate. If you don’t believe that she exists, now is the time to stop doubting:

suri-cruise-birth-certificate.jpg

According to TMZ, there were several irregularities in the birth certificate:

In this case, Suri was born on April 18 but the certificate was not filed until May 8, 20 days later. An official from the hospital told TMZ that the delay occurred because they needed a signature from the parents or a representative of the parents certifying birth, and that person did not come in until May 4. The person who signed is labeled “friend.” The signature is not legible.

However, it now seems much more likely that Suri Cruise isn’t just a figment of our imagination!

Britney Spears looks bizarre in Bazaar

Posted in Britney Spears, Babies by The Gossip Monger on June 28th, 2006.

And people thought Britney Spears had hit an all-time low during her much-hyped, publicist-less, horrific, nightmare-inducing interview with Matt Lauer. Or maybe the all-time low was when she tried to rebound by selling photos and an interview for $200,000 but could only pawn it off to OK! Magazine for $5,000.

Either way, you’d think that Britney would have hit the bottom already. But apparently not: the August edition of Harper’s Bazaar, typically a fashion magazine (you know, for women who are interested in clothing, not lack thereof), was supposed to feature a naked and pregnant Britney on the cover. Britney ended up scrapping the idea, but there isn’t much to say except, wow.

Britney Spears Bazaar 1

And of course, we have the usual I’m-wearing-only-a-fur-coat photo — though usually, the girl’s not pregnant or as Photoshopped as Britney looks right here.

Britney Spears Bazaar 2

And the obligatory celebration-of-the-pregnant-form photo that I’m not sure is particularly flattering either…

Britney Spears Bazaar 5

And onto the less naked ones. She actually looks half-decent in this one, where you can’t tell she’s pregnant.

Britney Spears Bazaar 3

Not sure what this one says about fashion — wasn’t this a trend, oh, 50 years ago? Or … ever? Gotta love the ruffles around her neck… then again, I guess it is appropriate that Britney start dressing up like a clown.

Britney Spears Bazaar 2

And finally, one with Sean Preston thinking, “Look at all the purty colors!” I like the dress, but seriously, if she tried to walk in that with the baby in her arms, we’re going to have another round of “How bad a mother is Britney?” discussions. Don’t drop him!

Britney Spears Bazaar 4

Please note that these images are not hosted on this site or server; they are hotlinked.

Next Page »